I couldn't even see the work!!! How often do we have the pleasure of making that complaint - the last time for me was at tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/gauguin, post-mortem in extremis - a boundlessly comprehensive biography, but I had paid a hefty entrance fee for entry, as had everyone else... and in that instance, the complaint was slightly less pleasurable. At FPG, it's free, and the provenance and quality of the work is no less.
It was great - Southend's Critical Mass had it's audience in raptures about Focal Point showing photography - it was originally a photography gallery; those for whom photography is maybe less important, and are more engaged in 'contemporary', and for those who want to have something to fire up the intellectual taste-buds, it's there. I found some of it a little inaccessible, and I'm one of those who will do their research before going out the door. Nevertheless, the ways in which FPG is making itself more publicly accessible has been met with alacrity, judging from the comments flying around yesterday.
Coming from a 15-year career in art education, and being very fortunate to teach across the sectors, I've always started with what my audience knows, and take it from there - some will run ahead and we see leadership and authority in those who can express themselves with eloquence and clarity; those who are interested but find it difficult to grasp new ideas, ways of thinking, and decoding the sometimes oblique visual language of other artists; and those for whom an amount of contextualising information is essential to the introduction of previously unexplored work. It is pedagogic in approach, but 'knowledge is power' (scientia potentia est) creates a more common ownership of understanding, which is what I would want, for the personal experience to become a shared experience. But that's only my vision.
No comments:
Post a Comment